The problem this solves
Teams often know that quality is not working well but cannot isolate the cause. Symptoms may include recurring production defects, long regression cycles, unclear ownership, weak traceability, late testing, inconsistent practices, or poor release confidence.
The QA Health Check answers: Where are the most material quality gaps today, and what should we improve first?
Who this is for
- Product teams with inconsistent QA
- Organizations seeing rising escaped defects
- Teams with slow regression
- Managers lacking quality visibility
- Programs preparing for transformation
- Organizations unsure where to invest
What AskAQA reviews
Quality PracticesRequirements, test strategy, coverage, defects, release readiness.
Engineering CapabilityAutomation, CI/CD, environments, test data, maintainability.
Leadership & GovernanceOwnership, metrics, standards, risk visibility, improvement.
How the engagement works
1
DiscoverReview context, goals, quality pain points, and representative artifacts.
2
AssessInterview key roles and evaluate practices against a practical quality framework.
3
PrioritizeSeparate high-impact gaps from low-value noise.
4
RecommendCreate a focused improvement roadmap with owners and next actions.
Typical deliverables
- Current-state findings
- Key quality risks
- Strengths
- Improvement opportunities
- Prioritized recommendations
- 90-day action plan
Expected outcomes
Leaders receive a clearer view of quality risk and a practical sequence for improving capability without attempting to transform everything at once.
FAQ
Is this a maturity assessment?
It can inform one, but the Health Check is intentionally lighter and more problem-focused.
Do we need extensive documentation?
No. The review can work from the artifacts and evidence your teams already use.